shut UP, phone! GAH!
Jul. 28th, 2003 11:21 amUm yeah, so if you haven't seen the HP news with the uber smutty picture of H/HR, then you're living under a rock and should emerge immediatly.
I thought it was a joke until like halfway through, then i realized it was on MSNBC.com, and why does MSNBC have HP news in the first place? I'm a little concerned about all this...*takes deep breath and remembers that JKR won't let him go totally nuts*
Dumbledore a hippie? I think he's better off as a Visigoth...
PLOTBUNNIES ARE EATING MY BRAIN
I've got an HP and a PotC one I could be writing down, but I'm also trying to finish up my Neville Longbottom and the Theft of Harry Potter's Plot story (which is about 2/5 done, give or take.) And I'm clearly letting my Anita Blake-verse story hit the back burner again.
Plus, i think Anita Blake and Harry Dresden should meet. St. Louis and Chicago? def def def. Lt. Murphy/Anita? mmm, perhaps...
Like i would ever write that. *SnOrT*. IF i write some crazy crossover, Murph and Dresden are getting it on. End of Story.
And NO,
sociofemme, Hermione/Millicent is NOT the new Harry/Draco.
It's NOT.
I thought it was a joke until like halfway through, then i realized it was on MSNBC.com, and why does MSNBC have HP news in the first place? I'm a little concerned about all this...*takes deep breath and remembers that JKR won't let him go totally nuts*
Dumbledore a hippie? I think he's better off as a Visigoth...
PLOTBUNNIES ARE EATING MY BRAIN
I've got an HP and a PotC one I could be writing down, but I'm also trying to finish up my Neville Longbottom and the Theft of Harry Potter's Plot story (which is about 2/5 done, give or take.) And I'm clearly letting my Anita Blake-verse story hit the back burner again.
Plus, i think Anita Blake and Harry Dresden should meet. St. Louis and Chicago? def def def. Lt. Murphy/Anita? mmm, perhaps...
Like i would ever write that. *SnOrT*. IF i write some crazy crossover, Murph and Dresden are getting it on. End of Story.
And NO,
It's NOT.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-28 04:40 pm (UTC)Okay, it's not.
IT'S BETTER.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-28 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-28 04:51 pm (UTC)is not!
Date: 2003-07-28 05:42 pm (UTC)but i'm not telling you what's happening.
Heh heh heh
Re: is not!
Date: 2003-07-28 06:12 pm (UTC)Re: is not!
Date: 2003-07-28 07:25 pm (UTC)subconsciously you agree with me.
hahahahahaha
DO NOT
Date: 2003-07-28 07:30 pm (UTC)